|
|
Managing for Development Results (MfDR) signifies evidence-based decision making in the pursuit of human development. It is a strategy that uses sound information for policy making; it involves practical tools for planning, risk management, monitoring and evaluation. In partner countries and donor agencies MfDR delineates a shift from focusing on inputs and immediate outputs to performance and achievement of outcomes and long-term impacts. (more)
What's new
|
22-Aug-2008
Under the Paris Declaration, donors and partner countries commit to “reform procedures and strengthen incentives - including for recruitment, appraisal and training - for management and staff to work towards harmonisation, alignment and results”. DAC Peer Reviews highlight a number of positive efforts by individual donors. However, much more remains to be done. This report addresses this need and aims to provide donor agencies with guidance on how to improve aid effectiveness, and to assist them in identifying their strengths, weaknesses and gaps in incentives for promoting aid effectiveness.
|
|
25-Aug-2008
Any effort to develop serious capacity in the public sector to fully manage for results will have to start with an assessment of the existing capacity. Diagnostic reviews are an important - and growing - source of information to governments on the state of MfDR country systems. Together with the existing MfDR capacity assessment tools, this newly developed product allows developing countries to conduct assessments that provide a clear view of capacity gaps, develop actions to address them and target donor support.
|
|
22-Aug-2008
While discussion of MfDR has been widespread, it has occurred mostly at the technical level. Purpose of this Policy Brief is to define MfDR, emphasize its most important implications, and direct decision-makers to places where they can find additional information and examples of MfDR.
|
Mutal Accountability Country Case Studies
22-Aug-2008
Donors and partners are accountable for development results: “A major priority for partner countries and donors is to enhance mutual accountability and transparency in the use of development resources. This also helps strengthen public support for national policies and development assistance.” (Paris Declaration) Three country case studies examine how the mutual accountability process operates in Mozambique, Rwanda and Vietnam .
|
|
16-Apr-2008
This study is designed to identify ways of strengthening arrangements for the governance of aid at international level to reinforce country level arrangements for mutual accountability as set out in the Paris commitments.
|
See more news and events…
Top of page
|
|
